The evaluation of the eighth UNFPA Nigeria country programme demonstrates accountability in achieving results, supports evidence-based decision-making; and contributes key lessons to accelerate the implementation of the ICPD Programme of Action. It provides an independent assessment of the eighth country programme of UNFPA Nigeria and broadens the evidence base for the design of the ninth programme cycle.

The purpose of the country programme evaluation was to demonstrate accountability to stakeholders on the contribution of the country programme on agreed results; generate evidence and lessons to support evidence-based programming in UNFPA; and provide necessary evidence for the design of the UNFPA 10th country programme in Sri Lanka.

The purpose of the country programme evaluation is to demonstrate accountability to stakeholders for results achieved; support evidence-based decision-making; contribute important lessons learned to the knowledge base at UNFPA; and to provide independent inputs to the next country programme in Tanzania.

The goal of the country programme evaluation was to demonstrate accountability to stakeholders for the results achieved; to support evidence-based decision-making; to contribute important lessons to the organisation's knowledge base; and to provide independent inputs to the next UNFPA country programme cycle in Ghana.

The Evaluation Offices of UNAIDS and UNFPA, in collaboration with WFP, have jointly managed an independent evaluation of the UNAIDS Joint Programme’s contribution to efficient and sustainable financing for the AIDS response.

The evaluation finds that the Joint Programme has made important contributions to improving allocative and technical efficiency of the AIDS response. In countries, UNAIDS convening power, political advocacy and role as a neutral broker directly contribute to Global Fund and PEPFAR funding processes and domestic commitments to HIV.

The Joint Programme's inclusiveness of civil society, community-based organizations and key populations has directly contributed to funding key population services and community-led responses. However, more is needed to strengthen their capacity to engage in the financing agenda.

The evaluation recommends the Joint Programme to create a common vision and improve coordination with regard to the integration of HIV financing within the wider health and Universal Health Coverage financing agenda. Allocative and technical efficiency, particularly focused on domestic financing, should be a priority for the Joint Programme going forward.