L'objectif de l'évaluation était de fournir une évaluation indépendante du 6e Programme Algérie de l'UNFPA 2017-2021, et d'élargir la base de données factuelles pour la conception et la mise en œuvre du prochain cycle de programmation.
Évaluation finale du 6ème Programme UNFPA Algérie (2017-2021)
Evaluation Documents:
Evaluation of the Government of Jordan/United Nations Population Fund 9th Country Programme (2018-2022)
The evaluation provides an independent assessment of UNFPA support and progress towards the expected outputs and outcomes set forth in the results framework of the 9th Country Programme of UNFPA Jordan. It also assesses the role played by the country office in the coordination of the UNCT towards collective contribution to national development results. The evaluation draws lessons from past and current cooperation and provides recommendations for the next programme cycle.
Evaluation Documents:
Évaluation du 6ème programme de l’UNFPA en assistance au gouvernement de la République d’Haïti (2017-2021)
L'objectif de l'évaluation est de déterminer le positionnement stratégique de l'UNFPA dans le nouveau contexte national et international, déterminer l'avantage comparatif de l'UNFPA en tant qu'agence en matière de santé maternelle et de population, analyser les leçons apprises et fournir des recommandations pertinentes, pour la formulation du nouveau programme de pays.
Evaluation Documents:
Evaluation finale du 7ème Programme de Coopération Togo-UNFPA (2019-2023)
L'évaluation fournit une évaluation indépendante du 7e programme de pays du FNUAP au Togo. L'évaluation élargit également la base de preuves pour la conception et la mise en œuvre du prochain cycle de programme.
Evaluation Documents:
Evaluation of the UNFPA 9th Country Programme of assistance to the Government of India (2018-2022)
The country programme evaluation provides an independent assessment of the UNFPA 9th Country Programme of assistance to the Government of India (2018-2022). It broadens the evidence base to inform the design of the next programme cycle and contributes to the UN Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework (UNSDCF) evaluation 2018-2022 and the design of the new UNSDCF.
Evaluation Documents:
Evaluation du 8ème programme pays UNFPA Centrafrique 2018-2022
L'évaluation du 8e programme de pays de l’UNFPA Centrafrique (2018-2022) vise à rendre compte aux parties prenantes de sa performance en termes de résultats de développement et d'investissement des ressources, à soutenir une prise de décision éclairée basée sur des preuves et à tirer des enseignements précieux pour la conception de le prochain cycle de programme.
Evaluation Documents:
UNFPA Libya Country Programme Evaluation (2019–2022)
This evaluation provides the UNFPA country office in Libya, national stakeholders, the UNFPA Arab States Regional Office, and UNFPA Headquarters as well as a wider audience with an independent assessment of UNFPA Libya’s first country programme (2019-2022). It also broadens the evidence base for the design of the next programme cycle.
Evaluation Documents:
Country Programme Evaluation of UNFPA 9th Country Programme (2018-2022) of assistance to the Government of Pakistan
The country programme evaluation demonstrates accountability to stakeholders for the results achieved by the UNFPA 9th Country Programme. It supports evidence-based decision-making and contributes important lessons learned to the organisation's knowledge base. It also provides independent inputs to the next UNFPA country programme cycle in Pakistan, and informs the strategic direction of the organisation's continued role.
Evaluation Documents:
Evaluación del VII Programa de País (2019 – 2022) del Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas en Ecuador
La Evaluación del VII Programa País 2019-2022 de UNFPA Ecuador comprende el estudio de las intervenciones planificadas y/o implementadas en el marco de las áreas programáticas y sus tres resultados: salud sexual y reproductiva, igualdad de género y empoderamiento de las mujeres y dinámica poblacional, en contextos de desarrollo y emergencia.
Evaluation Documents:
UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Evaluation of the UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): Accelerating Change
The joint evaluation assesses the extent to which the UNFPA-UNICEF joint programme has accelerated the abandonment of FGM/C in 15 programme countries (2008-2012). The evaluation provides an opportunity to ensure accountability to donors and other stakeholders, and is also a useful learning exercise. The evaluation assesses the relevance, efficiency, sustainability and the effectiveness of the holistic and multi-sectoral approach adopted by UNFPA and UNICEF in their programme for the acceleration of the abandonment of FGM/C. Furthermore, it also assesses the quality of the coordination mechanisms that have been established at the global level and within countries to maximize the effectiveness of joint programme interventions. Finally, the evaluation provides recommendations for the future direction of the FGM/C policies and programmes and gives UNFPA and UNICEF insights into the successes and challenges in conducting joint programming.
Country Reports
The case studies presented below are independent assessments of the UNFPA-UNICEF joint programme support for the acceleration of the abandonment of the FGM/C in Kenya, Burkina Faso, Senegal and Sudan.
Kenya Country Case Study Report
Burkina Faso Country Case Study Report
Senegal Country Case Study Report
Sudan Country Case Study Report
| Country Entry Date in the FGM/C Joint Programme | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2009 | 2011 |
| 1. Djibouti | 9. Burkina Faso | 13. Eritrea |
| 2. Egypt | 10. Gambia | 14. Mali |
| 3. Ethiopia | 11. Uganda | 15. Mauritania |
| 4. Guinea | 12. Somalia | |
| 5. Guinea Bissau | ||
| 6. Kenya | ||
| 7. Senegal | ||
| 8. Sudan | ||
Further reads
Presentation of Main Results of the Joint Evaluation at the International Conference on FGM/C in Rome
Informal Consultation with the Executive Boards of UNICEF and UNFPA
Formal Consultation with UNFPA Executive Board, Statement of the Director, Evaluation Office
Terms of Reference and Inception Report