The joint evaluation, conducted by the Evaluation Offices of UNFPA (lead agency) and UNICEF, assesses the programme contributions to outputs and outcomes during Phase III of the Joint Programme on the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation (2018-2021). The evaluation provides evidence and lessons to inform the design of the Joint Programme post-Phase III to accelerate towards the Sustainable Development Goal target to end female genital mutilation (FGM) by 2030.

The evaluation finds that the Joint Programme continues to be a strategic and relevant response to the global issue of ending FGM. The Joint Programme has adapted effectively to COVID-19. The agility with which the programme has responded provides lessons for adapting to and understanding FGM within humanitarian settings. Yet, FGM receives insufficient consideration in humanitarian systems. The Joint Programme design is gender responsive, with a clear aspiration to move towards a gender-transformative approach, however, greater clarity is required to translate this approach to the country level.

Data collection methods

Among the several recommendations, the evaluation recommends the Joint Programme prioritize its global policy and advocacy work and should strategically strengthen the implementation of accountability systems. The Joint Programme should also advocate for fully funded national legal and policy frameworks, including addressing complex situations such as medicalization and cross-border FGM. A humanitarian approach should also be integrated within the post-Phase III Joint Programme design.

These lessons and evidence may also accelerate the implementation of the UNFPA strategic plan, 2022-2025, focused on ending gender-based violence and harmful practices against all women and girls, especially those that are furthest behind.

Further reads

Evaluation of Phase I and Phase II of the Joint Programme

A presente avaliação tem como objeto o 6º Programa de País (2017-2021) do Fundo de População das Nações Unidas (UNFPA) no Brasil. Trata-se de uma avaliação externa e independente encomendada pelo Escritório de País e que tem como propósitos: determinar em que medida os resultados do 6º Programa de País foram atingidos; identificar lições aprendidas; produzir evidências para a aprendizagem, o processo decisório e a transparência da operação do UNFPA no Brasil; e formular recomendações úteis e baseadas em evidências para o desenho do próximo Programa de País.

This report is an independent, external evaluation and presents the process, findings, conclusions and recommendations of UNFPA’s work in Syria under the 8th Country Programme Document (CPD) during the period 2016-2020. The purpose of the Country Programme Evaluation (CPE) was to assess the achievement of the intended programme results, providing credible information on the CP relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability, coordination, coverage and connectedness in order to support decision-making by the programme management and national counterparts for further programme improvement and strategic positioning over the new country program.

This Regional Programme Evaluation focuses on the Arab States Regional Intervention Action Plan 2018-2021. The purpose of the evaluation was to demonstrate accountability to stakeholders on the performance achieved; to support evidence-based decision-making; to contribute important lessons learned to the knowledge base of the organization; and, in turn, to provide independent inputs to the next Regional Interventions Action Plan and the strategic direction of the continued role for UNFPA ASRO support to the country offices in the region.