The Evaluation Offices of UNAIDS and UNFPA, in collaboration with WFP, have jointly managed an independent evaluation of the UNAIDS Joint Programme’s contribution to efficient and sustainable financing for the AIDS response.

The evaluation finds that the Joint Programme has made important contributions to improving allocative and technical efficiency of the AIDS response. In countries, UNAIDS convening power, political advocacy and role as a neutral broker directly contribute to Global Fund and PEPFAR funding processes and domestic commitments to HIV.

The Joint Programme's inclusiveness of civil society, community-based organizations and key populations has directly contributed to funding key population services and community-led responses. However, more is needed to strengthen their capacity to engage in the financing agenda.

The evaluation recommends the Joint Programme to create a common vision and improve coordination with regard to the integration of HIV financing within the wider health and Universal Health Coverage financing agenda. Allocative and technical efficiency, particularly focused on domestic financing, should be a priority for the Joint Programme going forward.

The meta-synthesis captures lessons learned on what works and what does not work in United Nations youth programming from 2015 to 2021, specifically around youth participation and youth and human rights. 

The lessons and illustrative examples were distilled from 150+ youth evaluations, and centre around enabling key actors, stepping up accountability for and with youth, engaging youth in multiple capacities, and strengthening representation and inclusion of youth in programmes. This rich evidence contributes to advancing the implementation of the United Nations Youth Strategy 2030, a system-wide framework for how the United Nations should programme for, with, and alongside youth. 

This inter-agency knowledge collaboration was co-led by the Evaluation Offices of UNFPA and UNICEF along with EvalYouth Global Network, Office of the Secretary-General's Envoy on Youth and FAO, ILO, IOM,  DPPA/PBSO, UNDP and UNIDO. The evidence generated through this exercise will support the implementation of transformative approaches in youth programming in the Decade of Action. 

#Eval4Youth

Related documents

What works to amplify the rights and voices of youth in peace and resilience building?

What works to amplify the rights and voices of youth in education and employment?

The joint evaluation, conducted by the Evaluation Offices of UNFPA (lead agency) and UNICEF, assesses the programme contributions to outputs and outcomes during Phase III of the Joint Programme on the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation (2018-2021). The evaluation provides evidence and lessons to inform the design of the Joint Programme post-Phase III to accelerate towards the Sustainable Development Goal target to end female genital mutilation (FGM) by 2030.

The evaluation finds that the Joint Programme continues to be a strategic and relevant response to the global issue of ending FGM. The Joint Programme has adapted effectively to COVID-19. The agility with which the programme has responded provides lessons for adapting to and understanding FGM within humanitarian settings. Yet, FGM receives insufficient consideration in humanitarian systems. The Joint Programme design is gender responsive, with a clear aspiration to move towards a gender-transformative approach, however, greater clarity is required to translate this approach to the country level.

Data collection methods

Among the several recommendations, the evaluation recommends the Joint Programme prioritize its global policy and advocacy work and should strategically strengthen the implementation of accountability systems. The Joint Programme should also advocate for fully funded national legal and policy frameworks, including addressing complex situations such as medicalization and cross-border FGM. A humanitarian approach should also be integrated within the post-Phase III Joint Programme design.

These lessons and evidence may also accelerate the implementation of the UNFPA strategic plan, 2022-2025, focused on ending gender-based violence and harmful practices against all women and girls, especially those that are furthest behind.

Further reads

Evaluation of Phase I and Phase II of the Joint Programme

The UNFPA-UNICEF Global Programme to End Child Marriage (2016-2030) contributes to Sustainable Development Goal 5.3, which aims to eliminate all harmful practices, including child marriage. The COVID-19 pandemic hit at the very beginning of Phase II (2020-2023) of the Global Programme and profoundly affected the everyday lives of girls. It is estimated that by 2030 there may be an additional 10 million child brides due to pandemic induced poverty and economic insecurity, interruptions in prevention and protection services and school closures.

To further refine the Global Programme’s ability to deliver in changing contexts, the Evaluation Offices of UNFPA and UNICEF conducted a joint assessment of the Global Programme adaptations to the COVID-19 crisis in 2021. 

The results of the assessment indicate that the Global Programme should retain the focus and efforts to reach the most vulnerable and marginalized adolescents, ensuring their access to education, health and social welfare services. It is also critical to overcome the drivers of poverty by leveraging existing social protection schemes. Evidence must be used to inform programming, as well as to advocate with governments to keep child marriage prevention and response on the national agendas. In addition, continue to develop legal and operational frameworks that can accelerate the end of child marriage.

These lessons will accelerate the pace of the Global Programme, and in turn support the realization of the UNFPA strategic plan, 2022-2025, towards the delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals.

The Evaluation Offices of UNAIDS (chair), UNFPA, UNESCO, UNHCR and ILO jointly managed an independent evaluation of the UN Joint Programme on AIDS on preventing and responding to violence against women and girls in all their diversity.

The evaluation assesses the Joint Programme’s accountability to end violence against women and girls and the bi-directional nature of violence against women and girls and HIV, where violence against women and girls can be an indirect and direct factor for increased HIV risk, and violence can be an outcome of HIV status and disclosure.

The evaluation combined global consultation and document review with nine in-depth country case studies. Of note, the evaluation set up a group of women in their diversity to guide the process, input into key deliverables, and be part of the in-country data collection. These were women well-networked nationally and/or embedded in national organizations of women living with HIV and/or national organizations addressing violence against women.

The evaluation found that the Joint Programme is supporting countries to work collaboratively to some extent with women’s and relevant civil society networks in addressing gender equality, HIV and violence against women and girls, however inadequate attention is given to transformative approaches to address the structural and root causes of gender inequality, HIV and violence against women and girls. 

The evaluation provides strategic and operational recommendations for the Joint Programme. Its evidence and lessons learned also contribute to the implementation of the UNFPA strategic plan, 2022-2025, and towards ending the AIDS epidemic and violence against women and girls.