Audit of the UNFPA Country Office in Central African Republic

Audit number

IA/2024-06

Rating

Partially Satisfactory with major improvement needed

Internal audit reports

Audit of the UNFPA Country Office in Central African Republic

1

UNFPA Angola 8th Country Programme Evaluation (2020-2022)

Document date: 2022

Evaluation type: Country

Region: East & Southern Africa

Country: Angola

Joint evaluation: n/a

System-wide evaluation: n/a

Download resources

This evaluation independently assesses the UNFPA Angola 8th country programme, offering evidence-based insights to inform the design of the next programme cycle. The evaluation also assesses the geographic and demographic coverage of the UNFPA humanitarian assistance, and the organization's ability to integrate immediate, life-saving support with long-term development goals.

Evaluation documents

Evaluation Report
Management Response
Evaluation Quality Assessment

Formative evaluation of the organizational resilience of UNFPA in light of its response to the COVID-19 pandemic

Formative evaluation of the organizational resilience of UNFPA in light of its response to the COVID-19 pandemic

Document date: 2024

Evaluation type: Global

Region: n/a

Joint evaluation: n/a

System-wide evaluation: n/a

Download resources

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has been far-reaching. The pandemic has widened existing inequalities, and disproportionately affected vulnerable populations, especially women and girls by limiting access to vital health services and intensifying gender-based violence and harmful practices. UNFPA adapted its operations to the pandemic and is leveraging lessons from this experience as an opportunity to reinforce its organizational resilience, in anticipation of future crises and disruptions. 

The formative evaluation of the organizational resilience of UNFPA in light of its response to the COVID-19 pandemic assesses the performance of UNFPA in responding to the pandemic. It also analyzes the ability of UNFPA to work across the humanitarian-development-peace nexus during the pandemic, as well as the organization's capacity to learn from the crisis, ensuring it is better prepared to anticipate, respond to, and adapt to future global crises. 

The evaluation reveals the COVID-19 pandemic served as a critical test of the resilience of UNFPA, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses. The organization demonstrated adaptability and innovation, with resourcefulness of its personnel to respond to the crisis. While UNFPA made significant contributions to mitigating the pandemic's effect on maternal health, family planning, and gender-based violence, these efforts fell short of the organization’s goals. The pandemic exposed gaps in business continuity management, but also fostered valuable learning experiences. Despite safeguarding the health and well-being of personnel and partners, disparities between staff and non-staff welfare emerged. 

The evaluation recommends several measures to bolster the resilience of UNFPA, including increased efforts to operationalize the humanitarian-development-peace nexus approach, embedding business continuity management throughout the organization, and improving supply chain resilience. UNFPA should foster a workplace culture that supports and values all personnel, and prioritizes the systematic management of knowledge and lessons learned.
 

Evaluation documents

Evaluation Report
Evaluation Brief
Evaluation Presentation
Management Response
Executive Board Paper
Statement by Director, UNFPA IEO to the Executive Board
Statement by UNFPA Deputy Executive Director-Programme on the Management Response

UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation

UNFPA and UNICEF have jointly led the largest global programme to accelerate the elimination of female genital mutilation (FGM) since 2008. In close collaboration with governments, grassroots community organizations and other key stakeholders, the Joint Programme harnesses the complementary expertise of both UNFPA and UNICEF, as well as the latest social science research, to prevent female genital mutilation across the 17 countries where the programme operates.

Are we getting there? A synthesis of UN system evaluations of SDG 5

Are we getting there? A synthesis of UN system evaluations of SDG 5

Document date: 2024

Evaluation type: Global

Region: n/a

Joint evaluation: Yes

System-wide evaluation: n/a

Download resources

At the midpoint of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, progress on SDG 5 on achieving gender equality and empowering all women and girls has stalled. Recognizing this challenge, the independent evaluation offices of UN Women, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF and WFP collaborated to conduct an inter-agency synthesis of United Nations system evaluations related to SDG 5.

The dataset of SDG 5 evaluations included 619 evaluation reports from 33 United Nations entities. Of these, nearly half of the evaluations were chosen for further analysis. The analysis synthesised evidence on what helps and hinders progress, what approaches work and do not work, and key lessons and evidence gaps across the nine targets of SDG 5.

The report identifies several factors that contribute to progress towards SDG 5. These include the critical role of the United Nations towards advancing gender-responsive legislation, and the effectiveness of integrated and holistic programming. The report further highlights the use of knowledge, data and research to support advocacy efforts, technical support and capacity strengthening, and the essential role of civil society partners in driving progress towards SDG 5. 

However, operationalizing the principle of ‘leaving no one behind’ remains a challenge. Prioritising gender in humanitarian situations must be more sustained and comprehensive. Stronger and innovative monitoring and evaluation approaches are needed to assess contribution more rigorously towards gender equality outcomes. Harmful social norms and inadequate financing for gender equality initiatives remain significant barriers. Government commitment and institutional readiness are critical enabling factors for the development and implementation of legislation, policies and services. Evaluations also highlight the detrimental impact of COVID-19 on gender equality outcomes and programming across the targets. 

These findings can catalyse action by providing policymakers, programme implementers, donors and United Nations agencies with evidence and lessons learned to speed up collective efforts to accelerate progress on SDG 5. 

Getting there together: A synthesis of inter-agency programme evaluations on SDG 5: A companion to ‘Are we getting there? A synthesis of UN system evaluations of SDG 5’

With a growing emphasis on United Nations inter-agency collaboration, this companion report analyses 68 inter-agency evaluations, including those that were excluded from the main synthesis report due to their 2023 completion date. This analysis provides unique insights into joint United Nations programming for SDG 5, examining its strategic significance, effectiveness, coherence, enabling factors, barriers, recommendations, evidence gaps, and lessons learned. Specifically, this report explores the role of inter-agency work in achieving SDG 5 targets, successful collaborative practices, areas for improved coordination, and existing knowledge gaps.

 

Evaluation documents

Synthesis of UN system evaluations of SDG 5
Synthesis of inter-agency programme evaluations of SDG 5

Additional resources

Publication date

2024

Resources

Ex-post Publication of Information on Implementing Partners - IPA 2020_420-694

Ex-post Publication of Information on Implementing Partners - IPA 2020/420-694

EU for Gender Equality-Implementation of the EU Gender Equality acquis

Costed evaluation plan guidance, tools and templates

Resource date

03 July 2025

Administrative Resource

Costed evaluation plan: Guidance, tools and templates

1
GenAI-powered evaluation function at UNFPA, Strategy for leveraging the benefits of responsible and ethical generative artificial intelligence while minimizing risks

Resource date

29 April 2024

Administrative Resource

GenAI-powered evaluation function at UNFPA

Strategy for leveraging the benefits of responsible and ethical generative artificial intelligence while minimizing risks

1
Resource cover image showing policy cover page

Publisher

UNFPA PD

Resource date

18 April 2024

Author

ITSO

Administrative Resource

Policy for Information and Communications Technology (ICT)

This policy defines the principles and procedures related to the procurement, development, issuance, use and support of end-user equipment, software and other ICT systems.

Updates

Capacity building opportunity for young evaluators

calendar_today18 April 2024

1