The Inter-Agency Humanitarian Evaluation (IAHE) is an independent assessment of the preparedness and response of Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) members to the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020-2022. It is the first-ever evaluation of the IASC's humanitarian response to infectious disease events. It is also the largest IAHE of a humanitarian response to a pandemic. 

The evaluation assesses the humanitarian system’s response to COVID-19, identifies best practices and lessons learned, and highlights challenges and opportunities to improve responses to global crises in the future.

The evaluation team conducted 640 interviews; 169 focus group discussions and reviewed over 3,500 documents. Eight case studies were conducted in Bangladesh, Colombia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Philippines, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Syria, and Türkiye.

The IAHE highlights the humanitarian community’s strong response in expanding and adapting its programming to meet the needs of a large affected population during the pandemic. However, the worldwide restrictions on international aid highlighted the need for long-awaited reforms in locally-led humanitarian action and accountability to affected people. Progress in these areas could have improved the COVID-19 humanitarian response to vulnerable people; expanded delivery capacities; prevented the risks of sexual exploitation and abuse and built trust with affected communities. The main challenge to advancing these areas is a lack of leadership, incentives, and commitments from major players to change the current aid architecture. 

The IAHE recommends the IASC accelerate humanitarian reforms and improve pandemic preparedness. The global humanitarian community should also prioritize a people-centred, locally-led response that places affected individuals at the forefront of response efforts. 

The evaluation was undertaken by the IASC-associated Inter-Agency Evaluation Humanitarian Steering Group, chaired by OCHA. UNFPA Evaluation Office was part of the management group, including ALNAP, DRC (on behalf of the ICVA), IOM, SCHR, UNDP, UNHCR, UNICEF, WFP and WHO. The Global Evaluation Advisory Group included Action Aid, Asia Pacific Network of Refugees, AUB, FCDO, German Federal Foreign Office, Ground Truth Solutions, GMI, McGill University, UN, USAID, United Nations Resident Coordinator, Chad, and the World Bank.

The evaluation provides an assessment of the relevance and performance of the UNFPA country programme in the Republic of Moldova from 2018 to 2021. The evaluation also assesses the Country Office’s ability to respond to national priority needs, while adding value to the national development results including in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The evidence and recommendations emerging from the evaluation will inform the design of the next country programming cycle.

The evaluation assesses the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability of UNFPA support to Sierra Leone. It also assesses the geographic and demographic coverage of UNFPA humanitarian assistance, and the role played by UNFPA in enhancing the United Nations collective contribution to national development and humanitarian results in Sierra Leone. The evaluation also provides forward-looking and actionable recommendations to support the development of the eighth UNFPA Country Programme in Sierra Leone.