Ending maternal mortality

Publisher

WHO

Publication date

May 2024

Author

WHO/UNFPA

Resources

TRS 1044 - Annex 10: WHO/UNFPA technical specification for TCu380A intrauterine device

WHO/UNFPA technical specification for TCu380A intrauterine device

Overview

This annex contains the World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) technical specification for TCu380A intrauterine device (IUD), which is suitable for bulk procurement of the TCu380A IUD for use in public sector programmes for family planning.

Job description

1

About UNFPA

We promote gender equality and empower women, girls and young people to take control of their bodies and their futures.

Learn more

Job description

1

About UNFPA

We promote gender equality and empower women, girls and young people to take control of their bodies and their futures.

Learn more

Related jobs

News

Six UNFPA programmes around the world ensuring “health for all” in a world of 8 billion

calendar_today06 April 2023

The 2023 theme for World Health Day, 7 April, is “Health for all”. © WHO
1

Publisher

UNFPA Supply Chain Management Unit

Publication date

2023

Author

UNFPA Supply Chain Management Unit

Resources

Contraceptive Price Indicator 2022

Job description

1

About UNFPA

We promote gender equality and empower women, girls and young people to take control of their bodies and their futures.

Learn more

News

Historic drought in the Horn of Africa: Women and girls fleeing one crisis for another

calendar_today24 March 2023

Rukia Yaroow Ali, 38, was displaced with her nine children by the worst drought that Somalia – and the whole of the Horn of Africa – has seen in 40 years. Here she holds her youngest child outside their shelter at Hagadera refugee camp in Daadab, Garissa county, Kenya. © UNFPA/Luis Tato
1

Job description

1

About UNFPA

We promote gender equality and empower women, girls and young people to take control of their bodies and their futures.

Learn more

Job description

1

About UNFPA

We promote gender equality and empower women, girls and young people to take control of their bodies and their futures.

Learn more

Inter-Agency Humanitarian Evaluation of the COVID-19 Humanitarian Response

A visual with the text Inter-Agency Humanitarian Evaluation of the COVID-19 Humanitarian Response

Document date: 2022

Evaluation type: Global

Region: n/a

Joint evaluation: n/a

System-wide evaluation: Yes

Download resources

The Inter-Agency Humanitarian Evaluation (IAHE) is an independent assessment of the preparedness and response of Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) members to the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020-2022. It is the first-ever evaluation of the IASC's humanitarian response to infectious disease events. It is also the largest IAHE of a humanitarian response to a pandemic. 

The evaluation assesses the humanitarian system’s response to COVID-19, identifies best practices and lessons learned, and highlights challenges and opportunities to improve responses to global crises in the future.

The evaluation team conducted 640 interviews; 169 focus group discussions and reviewed over 3,500 documents. Eight case studies were conducted in Bangladesh, Colombia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Philippines, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Syria, and Türkiye.

The IAHE highlights the humanitarian community’s strong response in expanding and adapting its programming to meet the needs of a large affected population during the pandemic. However, the worldwide restrictions on international aid highlighted the need for long-awaited reforms in locally-led humanitarian action and accountability to affected people. Progress in these areas could have improved the COVID-19 humanitarian response to vulnerable people; expanded delivery capacities; prevented the risks of sexual exploitation and abuse and built trust with affected communities. The main challenge to advancing these areas is a lack of leadership, incentives, and commitments from major players to change the current aid architecture. 

The IAHE recommends the IASC accelerate humanitarian reforms and improve pandemic preparedness. The global humanitarian community should also prioritize a people-centred, locally-led response that places affected individuals at the forefront of response efforts. 

The evaluation was undertaken by the IASC-associated Inter-Agency Evaluation Humanitarian Steering Group, chaired by OCHA. UNFPA Evaluation Office was part of the management group, including ALNAP, DRC (on behalf of the ICVA), IOM, SCHR, UNDP, UNHCR, UNICEF, WFP and WHO. The Global Evaluation Advisory Group included Action Aid, Asia Pacific Network of Refugees, AUB, FCDO, German Federal Foreign Office, Ground Truth Solutions, GMI, McGill University, UN, USAID, United Nations Resident Coordinator, Chad, and the World Bank.

Evaluation documents

Evaluation Report

Select a language to download

Download
Executive Summary

Select a language to download

Download

We use cookies and other identifiers to help improve your online experience. By using our website you agree to this, see our cookie policy

X